{"id":2068,"date":"2017-02-17T12:27:46","date_gmt":"2017-02-17T10:27:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/waldkritik.de\/?p=2068"},"modified":"2017-02-17T12:27:46","modified_gmt":"2017-02-17T10:27:46","slug":"herr-lieber-antwortet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/waldkritik.de\/?p=2068","title":{"rendered":"Herr Lieber antwortet"},"content":{"rendered":"<h4>Herr Lieber antwortet f\u00fcr die PEFC-ARBEITSGRUPPE am Ministerium f\u00fcr\u00a0 den l\u00e4ndlichen Raum<\/h4>\n<p>Auf die Bitte\u00a0 neutrale Gutachter einzubeziehen, antwortet Herr Lieber: Grundlage der Pr\u00fcfung der Beschwerde, sei unter anderem, die gutachterliche Stellungnahme eines externen Forstexperten&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>DIE INITITIVE HATTE LUTZ F\u00c4HSER UND KARL-FRIEDRICH WEBER als <em>unabh\u00e4ngige Forstexperten<\/em> VORGESCHLAGEN<\/p>\n<p>weiterlesen =&gt; &#8230; <a href=\"https:\/\/waldkritik.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/PEFC-H.Lieber-vom-10.2.2017.pdf\">PEFC-H.Lieber vom 10.2.2017<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/waldkritik.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/P1010475.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-1569\" src=\"https:\/\/waldkritik.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/P1010475.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"450\" srcset=\"https:\/\/waldkritik.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/P1010475.jpg 600w, https:\/\/waldkritik.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/P1010475-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/waldkritik.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/P1010475-500x375.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/waldkritik.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/P1010469.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-1567\" src=\"https:\/\/waldkritik.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/P1010469.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"450\" srcset=\"https:\/\/waldkritik.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/P1010469.jpg 600w, https:\/\/waldkritik.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/P1010469-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/waldkritik.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/P1010469-500x375.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/waldkritik.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/P1010473.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter  wp-image-1568\" src=\"https:\/\/waldkritik.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/P1010473.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"488\" height=\"651\" srcset=\"https:\/\/waldkritik.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/P1010473.jpg 450w, https:\/\/waldkritik.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/P1010473-225x300.jpg 225w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 488px) 100vw, 488px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Herr Lieber antwortet f\u00fcr die PEFC-ARBEITSGRUPPE am Ministerium f\u00fcr\u00a0 den l\u00e4ndlichen Raum Auf die Bitte\u00a0 neutrale Gutachter einzubeziehen, antwortet Herr Lieber: Grundlage der Pr\u00fcfung der Beschwerde, sei unter anderem, die gutachterliche Stellungnahme eines externen Forstexperten&#8230; DIE INITITIVE HATTE LUTZ F\u00c4HSER UND KARL-FRIEDRICH WEBER als unabh\u00e4ngige Forstexperten VORGESCHLAGEN weiterlesen =&gt; &#8230; PEFC-H.Lieber vom 10.2.2017<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2068","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-der-wald"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/waldkritik.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2068","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/waldkritik.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/waldkritik.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/waldkritik.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/waldkritik.de\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2068"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/waldkritik.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2068\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2080,"href":"https:\/\/waldkritik.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2068\/revisions\/2080"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/waldkritik.de\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2068"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/waldkritik.de\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2068"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/waldkritik.de\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2068"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}